設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:212659 瀏覽總數:563023146
文章總數:212659 瀏覽總數:563023147
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



雙標讓社會陷入鬥爭
加班費可以用其他津貼代替嗎?
《今日看新聞學法律第2則~營養午餐禁用美豬》
《今日看新聞學法律第1則~緩起訴及撤銷緩起訴》
《今日看新聞學法律第4則~國家賠償與行使公權力》
政府講證據,人民才信服
《今日看新聞學法律第1則~悔婚及其賠償》
《今日看新聞學法律第2則~扶養》
《今日看新聞學法律第3則~停車位被侵奪、分管契約》
《今日看新聞學法律~自主控制個人資料之資訊隱私權等》
《今日看新聞學法律第2則~國王與國王一書爭議及受教育權》
《今日看新聞學法律第1則~成立公用地役關係之既成道路》
美豬進口,法治亂象叢生?
《今日看新聞學法律第3則~勞保年金改革與溯及既往、信賴保護》
《今日看新聞學法律第1則~如何成立管委會》
《今日看新聞學法律第2則~罪刑相當原則及酒駕撒銷假釋》
《法律問題討論~美牛、美豬開放》
今日看新聞學法律第2則~公私二元訴訟及假釋訴訟》
法稅228假案違反國際人權公約 台灣會遭國際抵制
《今日看新聞學法律~比例原則與警察懲戒》

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Holman Erection Co. v. Orville E. Madsen& Sons, Inc.  / 劉育偉
Holman Erection Co. v. Orville E. Madsen& Sons, Inc.330 N.W.2d 693Facts: The plaintiff who was a subcontractor brought an action against the defendant, alleging that defendant had breached a construction contract which the par ......(詳全文) 2009-10-05 02:20:00
Haines v. New York  / 劉育偉
Haines v. New York41N.Y.2d 769,396 N.Y.S.2d 155,364 N.E.2d 820 Facts: The defendant, New York City, entered into an agreement about the sewage system with town of Hunter and Tannersville in 1924. The plaintiff is the owner of uni ......(詳全文) 2009-10-04 02:20:00
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. Intern. Sales Corp.  / 劉育偉
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. Intern. Sales Corp.190 F.Supp.116. Facts: The defendant is seller and the plaintiff is buyer in this case. The plaintiff agrees to import certain quality of “chickens” from the defe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-03 02:20:00
Embry v. Hargading, Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.  / 劉育偉
Embry v. Hargading, Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.127 Mo.App.383, 105S.W.777 Facts: The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant company under a written contract to expire December 15, 1903, at a salary of $2,000 per annum. On Decemb ......(詳全文) 2009-10-02 02:20:00
Drennan v. Star Paving Co.  / 劉育偉
Drennan v. Star Paving Co.51 Cal.2d 409, 333 P.2d 757                Facts: On July 28, 1955, plaintiff, a licensed general contractor, was preparing a b ......(詳全文) 2009-10-01 02:20:00
Dickinson v. Dodds  / 劉育偉
Dickinson v. Dodds2 Ch. Div. 463 Facts: On 10th June, 1874, the defendant sent a memorandum to the plaintiff, which showed that the defendant wanted to sell his property. The memorandum contained specific date, time of acceptance ......(詳全文) 2009-09-30 02:20:00
Cole McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. Holloway  / 劉育偉
Cole McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. Holloway141 Tenn. 679,214 S.W. 817, 7 A.L.R. 1683. Facts: The traveling salesman of defendant received an offer from the plaintiff for certain quantity of goods on March 26,1917, which defendant was ......(詳全文) 2009-09-29 02:20:00
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.  / 劉育偉
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.【1893】1Q.B.256. Facts: The defendant advertised their balls in the newspapers and claimed that his products were sold as preventives against the influenza.£100 reward will be paid by the defen ......(詳全文) 2009-09-28 02:20:00
Bishop v. Eaton  / 劉育偉
Bishop v. Eaton161 Mass. 496, 37 N.E. 665 Facts: There was a contract of guaranty between the plaintiff and defendant’s brother Harry because the defendant had written a letter to request the plaintiff to assist his brother ......(詳全文) 2009-09-27 02:20:00
Berwick&Smith Co. v. Salem Press, Inc.  / 劉育偉
Berwick&Smith Co. v. Salem Press, Inc.331 Mass.196, 117 N.E.2d 825 Facts: The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of printing books. The defendant proposed to publish a two volume work called “Masterplots&rd ......(詳全文) 2009-09-26 02:20:00
Ardente v. Horan  / 劉育偉
Ardente v. Horan117 R.I.254, 366 A.2d 162 Facts: In August 1975, the property of defendant was offered for sale, the plaintiff accepted it, but added some items that never mentioned before the negotiation between the parties. The ......(詳全文) 2009-09-25 02:20:00
Akers v. J.B. Sedberry, Inc.  / 劉育偉
Akers v. J.B. Sedberry, Inc.39 Tenn.App.633, 286S.W.2d 617, cert. denied by Tenn.S.ct Facts: Plaintiffs have the employment contract with the defendant. On September 29,1950,due to the financial problem, plaintiffs offered to res ......(詳全文) 2009-09-24 02:20:00
Adams v. Lindsell  / 劉育偉
Adams v. Lindsell1 Barn. & Ald. 681. Facts: The defendant, who was a dealer in wool, wrote the letter to offer the plaintiff, who was a woolen manufacturer. And the defendant appointed the answer to reply by post. However, du ......(詳全文) 2009-09-23 02:20:00

1 [2]
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3722
律 師 的 叮 嚀

買賣寵物縱未以書面契約為之,而係以口頭就標的物及其價金互為約定,則寵物買賣契約即為成立,當事人自應依債之本旨為之給付,有無以書面契約為之,尚不影響寵物買賣契約之成立。

劉孟錦律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
文章資料內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為主張及訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
法令具時效性,文章內容及所引用資料,請自行查核法令動態及現行有效之實務見解
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意