設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:197655 瀏覽總數:444794542
文章總數:197655 瀏覽總數:444794543
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



「在美國,優先提名現任被法院判定是違憲的」
最高法院108年4月2日108年度第4次民事庭會議決議(連帶保證人責任之法律性質為何?)
解說韓國瑜0096 主張夏威夷關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0097 接受台灣關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0098 小英談民主?阿扁談民主?小英只配尿遁?
最高法院108年度第四次民事庭會議決議 連帶保證人責任之法律性質為何
宛如抱著玩具不放的小孩
解說韓國瑜0093 小英奢談軍紀?荒淫部隊?史上最差?
解說韓國瑜0094 加版台灣關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0095 主張琉球關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0096 主張夏威夷關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0097 接受台灣關係法?誰受屈辱?
解說韓國瑜0098 小英談民主?阿扁談民主?小英只配尿遁?
因工作調職或其他非自願性因素 而交易持有期間在兩年以下之房地,得按何種稅率課徵房地合一稅
臺北高等行政法院108年度停字第26號婦聯會與不當黨產處理委員會間聲請停止執行事件新聞稿
郭董生氣了
訴訟終結後,即無許可訴訟繫屬事實登記之必要(最高法院106年度台聲字第1108號民事裁定)
逃亡與脫逃,法律意義大不同
債權人就請求標的聲請對債務人為假處分,縱令於起訴後,祇要符合假處分要件之相關規定,法院即應准許,初無因有上述訴訟繫屬事實登記規定,得認為無假處分必要,而不予准許之理(最高法院97年度台抗字第339號民事裁定)
解說韓國瑜0088 扁蔡搞殘台灣經濟?勿低估選民智慧?

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Vogt v. Madden  / 劉育偉
Vogt v. Madden110 Idaho 6, 713 p.2d 442 Facts: The plaintiff and defendant had an oral sharecrop agreement for the year 1979, and they renewed the agreement for the year 1980.Under the agreement, certain expenses were borne by pl ......(詳全文) 2009-10-20 02:20:00
Spaulding v. Morse  / 劉育偉
Spaulding v. Morse322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137 Facts: George and Ruth Morse were married in 1921. Ruth obtained a decree of divorce which made provision for the custody and support of two children in 1932. It was agreed that Geor ......(詳全文) 2009-10-19 02:20:00
Ragosta v. Wilder  / 劉育偉
Ragosta v. Wilder156 Vt. 390, 592 A.2d 367 Facts: In 1987, the plaintiff mailed the defendant a letter offering to purchase the property along with a check for$2,000 and began arrangements to obtain the necessary financing. Howe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-18 02:20:00
Raffles v. Wichelhaus  / 劉育偉
Raffles v. Wichelhaus2 Hurl. &C. 906 Facts: The plaintiff sold the cotton to the defendant. And the parties agreed to transit goods by ship, which called Peerless sailed in October. But the cotton was delivered by another and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-17 02:20:00
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc.  / 劉育偉
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc. 416 Mass. 684, 624 N.E.2d 959. Facts: The defendant operated a waste disposal facility to dispose of hazardous waste material and the plaintiffs(Polaroid Co. and Hooke ......(詳全文) 2009-10-16 02:20:00
Phillips v. Moor  / 劉育偉
Phillips v. Moor71 Me. 78. Facts: It was a negotiation by letter that the purchase of the hay in plaintiff’s barn had pressed by the defendant and it was a written invitation to the defendant to make an offer about the hay. ......(詳全文) 2009-10-15 02:20:00
Payen v. Cave  / 劉育偉
Payen v. Cave3 Term R. 148 Facts: The plaintiff sold a certain machine by auction under usual conditions that the high bidder should be the purchaser. The defendant bid the highest bid price 40 pounds but the auctioneer dwelt and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-14 02:20:00
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos  / 劉育偉
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos380 So.2d 516. Facts: The defendant, a patient, had suffered serious disease to cause her doctor to order nursing care for her, and the hospital implemented this order by calling upon the plain ......(詳全文) 2009-10-13 02:20:00
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino  / 劉育偉
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino144 F.3d 1384 Facts: The plaintiff is the retailer of tiles and the defendant is the manufacturer of tiles. The parties arrived at an oral agreement on the sale of ......(詳全文) 2009-10-12 02:20:00
Lucy v. Zehmer  / 劉育偉
Lucy v. Zehmer196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 Facts: Defendant wrote a note to the plaintiff, which stated that the defendant is selling their farm to the plaintiff for $50,000.  The plaintiff put the note in his pocket and offer ......(詳全文) 2009-10-11 02:20:00
Lonergan v. Scolnick  / 劉育偉
Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal.App.2d 179,276 P.2d 8. Facts: Defendant placed an ad for sale his land. The defendant sent a letter to plaintiff to ask his intention on March 26. On April 8, the defendant sent another letter which wa ......(詳全文) 2009-10-10 02:20:00
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc  / 劉育偉
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 251 Minn. 188, N.W.2d 689 Facts: The plaintiff read the ads in the newspaper for certain furs on sale on a first come first serve. The plaintiff followed and was the first ......(詳全文) 2009-10-09 02:20:00
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.  / 劉育偉
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.238 La. 467,115 So.2d 821 Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement which provided that the defendant had two years to cut and remove timber from plaintiff’s land, and that ......(詳全文) 2009-10-08 02:20:00
Klockner v. Green  / 劉育偉
Klockner v. Green254 A.2d 782 Facts: Plaintiffs were the stepson and stepgranddaughter of the decedent and defendants were the executor of the estate, the surviving next of kin of decedent, and a legatee under decedent’s la ......(詳全文) 2009-10-07 02:20:00
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.  / 劉育偉
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.277 S.W. 631. Facts: Plaintiff is a manufacturer of machinery for the purification of water in connection with the manufacture of ice in Chicago and defendant is engaged i ......(詳全文) 2009-10-06 02:20:00

[1] 2
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3720
律 師 的 叮 嚀

如果你沒本事追求正義,千萬不要放棄希望,至少也要能夠找一些能夠幫你追求正義的朋友,他能幫助你在現有的體制下追求正義,在太多人的因素之下,雖然實質的正義未必得以伸張,但是至少能夠確保程序的正義。

劉孟錦律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
法律具時效性,內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意