設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 更新日期:2017-09-20 文章總數:181420 瀏覽:325020979(自2000.10.1起)
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
  台灣法律網新訊




法院命未成年子女權利義務之行使負擔由一造任之,其本質即包括他造應交付子女在內。倘一造持上開外國法院確定民事判決,訴請我國法院許可其強制執行,應類推適用家事事件法第85條第一項規定,准其聲請暫時處分(最高法院105年度台簡抗字第7號民事裁定)
假仙偽善無聊集 035 產業互補促共利 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 036 農林漁牧通有無 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 037 民生多福少軍購 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 038 兩岸交流慶和平 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 039 外事辦針對說明 莫言無忌杜撰
訴訟書面標準化要考慮人民憲法訴訟權影響
臺灣蔡政府臺獨面臨的「92共識」歷史問題
大陸放話北韓飛彈飛越東京政治目的
法扶不是經費擴高濫用而是正義問題
大陸為何急著簽署FTA自由貿易協議
【榕樹學堂訊】生態饗宴(陸鳥食堂)
夫妻之一方於准許離婚判決確定後死亡,倘生存之一方認該確定判決有法定再審事由,致其身分上或財產上之重大利益受到損害,無從類推適用家事事件法第63~65條由繼承人承受訴訟之規定,而有由法院為法律外之程序法上法之續造必要(最高法院105年度台抗字第802號民事裁定)
民進黨縣市首長施政滿意下滑的警訊
假仙偽善無聊集 030 臺灣省設人民政府 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 031 寶島台灣宜人居 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 032 好山好水不破壞 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 033 空污為害須減碳 莫言無忌杜撰
假仙偽善無聊集 034 燃氣發電太危險 莫言無忌杜撰
公務員加薪3%財源從加班費擠出來是這樣算的

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Vogt v. Madden  / 劉育偉
Vogt v. Madden110 Idaho 6, 713 p.2d 442 Facts: The plaintiff and defendant had an oral sharecrop agreement for the year 1979, and they renewed the agreement for the year 1980.Under the agreement, certain expenses were borne by pl ......(詳全文) 2009-10-20 02:20:00
Spaulding v. Morse  / 劉育偉
Spaulding v. Morse322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137 Facts: George and Ruth Morse were married in 1921. Ruth obtained a decree of divorce which made provision for the custody and support of two children in 1932. It was agreed that Geor ......(詳全文) 2009-10-19 02:20:00
Ragosta v. Wilder  / 劉育偉
Ragosta v. Wilder156 Vt. 390, 592 A.2d 367 Facts: In 1987, the plaintiff mailed the defendant a letter offering to purchase the property along with a check for$2,000 and began arrangements to obtain the necessary financing. Howe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-18 02:20:00
Raffles v. Wichelhaus  / 劉育偉
Raffles v. Wichelhaus2 Hurl. &C. 906 Facts: The plaintiff sold the cotton to the defendant. And the parties agreed to transit goods by ship, which called Peerless sailed in October. But the cotton was delivered by another and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-17 02:20:00
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc.  / 劉育偉
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc. 416 Mass. 684, 624 N.E.2d 959. Facts: The defendant operated a waste disposal facility to dispose of hazardous waste material and the plaintiffs(Polaroid Co. and Hooke ......(詳全文) 2009-10-16 02:20:00
Phillips v. Moor  / 劉育偉
Phillips v. Moor71 Me. 78. Facts: It was a negotiation by letter that the purchase of the hay in plaintiff’s barn had pressed by the defendant and it was a written invitation to the defendant to make an offer about the hay. ......(詳全文) 2009-10-15 02:20:00
Payen v. Cave  / 劉育偉
Payen v. Cave3 Term R. 148 Facts: The plaintiff sold a certain machine by auction under usual conditions that the high bidder should be the purchaser. The defendant bid the highest bid price 40 pounds but the auctioneer dwelt and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-14 02:20:00
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos  / 劉育偉
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos380 So.2d 516. Facts: The defendant, a patient, had suffered serious disease to cause her doctor to order nursing care for her, and the hospital implemented this order by calling upon the plain ......(詳全文) 2009-10-13 02:20:00
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino  / 劉育偉
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino144 F.3d 1384 Facts: The plaintiff is the retailer of tiles and the defendant is the manufacturer of tiles. The parties arrived at an oral agreement on the sale of ......(詳全文) 2009-10-12 02:20:00
Lucy v. Zehmer  / 劉育偉
Lucy v. Zehmer196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 Facts: Defendant wrote a note to the plaintiff, which stated that the defendant is selling their farm to the plaintiff for $50,000.  The plaintiff put the note in his pocket and offer ......(詳全文) 2009-10-11 02:20:00
Lonergan v. Scolnick  / 劉育偉
Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal.App.2d 179,276 P.2d 8. Facts: Defendant placed an ad for sale his land. The defendant sent a letter to plaintiff to ask his intention on March 26. On April 8, the defendant sent another letter which wa ......(詳全文) 2009-10-10 02:20:00
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc  / 劉育偉
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 251 Minn. 188, N.W.2d 689 Facts: The plaintiff read the ads in the newspaper for certain furs on sale on a first come first serve. The plaintiff followed and was the first ......(詳全文) 2009-10-09 02:20:00
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.  / 劉育偉
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.238 La. 467,115 So.2d 821 Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement which provided that the defendant had two years to cut and remove timber from plaintiff’s land, and that ......(詳全文) 2009-10-08 02:20:00
Klockner v. Green  / 劉育偉
Klockner v. Green254 A.2d 782 Facts: Plaintiffs were the stepson and stepgranddaughter of the decedent and defendants were the executor of the estate, the surviving next of kin of decedent, and a legatee under decedent’s la ......(詳全文) 2009-10-07 02:20:00
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.  / 劉育偉
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.277 S.W. 631. Facts: Plaintiff is a manufacturer of machinery for the purification of water in connection with the manufacture of ice in Chicago and defendant is engaged i ......(詳全文) 2009-10-06 02:20:00

 [1]  2
 
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3720
律 師 的 叮 嚀

刑罰律法應明確化,是罪刑法定原則之下的重要要求,不明確的律法若被裁判者以人性本惡原則,做下了偏差的解釋,或有逾越立法本意之嫌,也有違背空白刑法之虞。

劉孟錦律師


主持律師:台灣聯合法律事務所 劉孟錦律師
地址:106 台北市大安區羅斯福路二段91號13樓(台北捷運【古亭站】3號出口) 預約律師
電話:(02)2363-5003 (代表號)  傳真:(02)2363-5009  E-mail:Lawyer885885@gmail.com
設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
法律具時效性,內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意