設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:210775 瀏覽總數:548280690
文章總數:210775 瀏覽總數:548280691
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



從人民觀點看 國民法官制與人民陪審制是一場威權與法治之爭
養小鬼、佔缺、漂白
戀戀碧潭
『組織犯罪條例適用及減刑之探討』 法制座談會
司法院109年第六次人事審議委員會決議
台灣價值不可成絕響
校外實習,是勞工還是實習生?
媒體談“”史料“”,太扯了!  
【林蕙瑛專欄】女同志的性騷擾
國安法通過,台、港關係何去何從?
出賣土地之共有人應將出賣該應有部分之「同樣條件」通知他共有人,否則,即難認已合法通知行使優先承購權(最高法院109年度台上字第507號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】同居是一件大事
司法院就媒體報導有關擬訂「商業事件律師酬金支給標準草案初稿」為律師費上限等之澄清新聞稿
證言之證據力(最高法院 108 年台上字第 1259 號民事判決)
民法第74條第1 項所定之撤銷權,須以訴之形式向法院請求為撤銷其行為之形成判決,始能發生撤銷之效果(最高法院 109 年台上字第 894 號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】母愛是永遠在他身旁
「挺港」應靠「法治」而非「口惠」
司法院大法官釋字第792號解釋摘要-販賣毒品既遂案
對於一人負擔數宗債務而其給付之種類相同者,如清償人所提出之給付,不足清償全部債額時,不為指定其應抵充之債務者,其債務已屆清償期者,儘先抵充。如獲益及清償期均相等者,各按比例,抵充其一部(最高法院109 年台上字第 1190 號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】慈悲為懷充滿親情

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 作者專欄(二) > 劉育偉


Rylands v. Fletcher  / 劉 育偉
Rylands v. FletcherIn the house of Lords, L.R. 3H.L.330(1868)Strict liability(承攬關係,民508-非民188指揮監督之僱傭關係)Facts: The def were owners of a mill(磨坊). In order to supply it with water, they constructed a reserv ......(詳全文) 2009-09-05 01:00:00
Carpenter v. The Double R Cattle Co. Inc.  / 劉 育偉
Carpenter v. The Double R Cattle Co. Inc.701 P. 2d 222.(1985)Facts:被告牧場所飼養之牛隻排放的排泄物造成生活環境的破壞,原告主張nuisance向被告求償。Holding: Judgment for Def.Rationale:1. Majority: Interests of the community(公 ......(詳全文) 2009-09-04 01:00:00
Two Rivers Co. v. Curtiss Breeding Serv.(嚴格責任之範圍)  / 劉 育偉
Two Rivers Co. v. Curtiss Breeding Serv.(嚴格責任之範圍)Interests Protected624 F.2d 1242,cert.denied,450 U.S.920(1980)Facts:原告向被告購買種牛精子,但導致孕育出來之牛隻產生腳趾基因突變而求償。Issue:What’s the interest a ......(詳全文) 2009-09-03 01:00:00
Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr.(服務不適用嚴格責任)  / 劉 育偉
Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr.(服務不適用嚴格責任)225 Cal.Rptr.595(1986) Facts: The P filed a complaint against Def, alleging personal injury resulting from the implantation(植入)of a defective pacemaker.Issue:Whether ......(詳全文) 2009-09-02 01:00:00
Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.(二手貨不適用嚴格責任)  / 劉 育偉
Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.(二手貨不適用嚴格責任)Defendants other than principle manufacturers(製造人以外之被告)N.E. 2d 785(1975)Facts: A used car struck two boys. The P claimed for the retailer of the secondhand ......(詳全文) 2009-08-31 01:00:00
Roysdon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company(香菸之產品責任)  / 劉 育偉
Roysdon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company(香菸之產品責任)623 F. Supp.1189(1985)Facts: Mr. Roysdon suffers severe vascular disease(血管疾病)as a result of many years of smoking cigarettes manufactured by Def R.J. Reynolds Toba ......(詳全文) 2009-08-30 01:00:00
O’Brien v. Muskin Corp.(警告瑕疵)  / 劉 育偉
O’Brien v. Muskin Corp.(警告瑕疵)436 A 2d 298.(1983)Facts:原告跳水時,由於池底材質太滑致使保護頭部之手滑開,無法及時閃避而使頭部受傷Holding: Judgment for P.(縱使無design defect仍未能排除警告之責)Rationale: Strict liabi ......(詳全文) 2009-08-29 01:00:00
Henningsen v. Bloomfiled Motors, Inc.(Implied warranty)  / 劉 育偉
Henningsen v. Bloomfiled Motors, Inc.(Implied warranty)161 A.2d 69(1960)(民法第三五四條第一項強制法定擔保責任)Facts:原告於購車時未看清楚契約上小格的免責條款,於行駛中受傷而請求賠償。.Holding: Judgment for P.Rationale:Implied ......(詳全文) 2009-08-28 01:00:00
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.(Products Liability)  / 劉 育偉
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.(Products Liability)     111 N.E. 1050 (1916)Facts: Def who was a manufacturer of car sold the car to a car dealer(經銷商) who sold the car to P.  While P was driving, the ......(詳全文) 2009-08-27 01:00:00
Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.(Express warranties=Strict warranty liability)  / 劉 育偉
Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.(Express warranties=Strict warranty liability)456,12 P.2d 409.(1932)(即民354第二項)Facts:原告信賴被告nonshatterable glass的保證而購買,導致眼部受傷。Issue: Whether express warranty rests upon the pri ......(詳全文) 2009-08-26 01:00:00
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo  / 劉 育偉
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo478 A. 2d 755(1984)Facts: Theplaintiff was alleging that the doctors negligently deprived his parents of the choice of terminating the pregnancy(終止懷孕之選擇),he seeks general damages(直接損害= ......(詳全文) 2009-08-25 01:00:00
Pacific Mutual Life Ins. CO. v. Haslip  / 劉 育偉
Pacific Mutual Life Ins. CO. v. Haslip499 U.S, 1, 111 S. Ct. 1032, 113 L. Ed. 2d 1.(1991)Facts:保險經紀人侵吞原告之保險費,致原告發生損害時,無法向保險公司求償。 Issue:Doubts about the constitutionality(合憲性)of puniti ......(詳全文) 2009-08-24 01:00:00
Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.(about punitive damages)  / 劉 育偉
Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.(about punitive damages)297 N.W. 2d 727, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 (1980).Facts:PL’s 4y/o daughter was clothed in pajamas(睡衣)made from cotton material manufactured by Def Riegel. The materi ......(詳全文) 2009-08-23 01:00:00
Zimmerman v. Ausland(about mitigation of damages duty,纇民217第二項後段)  / 劉 育偉
Zimmerman v. Ausland(about mitigation of damages duty,纇民217第二項後段)513 P.2d 1167Facts: Zimmerman(P), suffered permanent injury in her knee as a result of an automobile accident caused by the negligence of the Ausland(De ......(詳全文) 2009-08-22 01:00:00
Hartridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.(有關民188)  / 劉 育偉
Hartridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.(有關民188)             86 Wis. 2d 1,271N.W.2d 598.(1978)Facts:The claim arise out of a two-car automobile accident ......(詳全文) 2009-08-21 01:00:00

1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3722
律 師 的 叮 嚀

偵查行為是檢察官調查犯罪事實的過程,雖然偵查階段不公開,但案件業經偵查終結並起訴,經由法院審理時,仍然由法院來看偵查過程有無疏漏,事實上案件的內容在審理時仍然會公開給被告知悉,只是在偵查階段未公開而已。

姜智逸律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
文章資料內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為主張及訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
法令具時效性,文章內容及所引用資料,請自行查核法令動態及現行有效之實務見解
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意