設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:210627 瀏覽總數:547137122
文章總數:210627 瀏覽總數:547137123
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



司法院109年第六次人事審議委員會決議
台灣價值不可成絕響
校外實習,是勞工還是實習生?
媒體談“”史料“”,太扯了!  
【林蕙瑛專欄】女同志的性騷擾
國安法通過,台、港關係何去何從?
出賣土地之共有人應將出賣該應有部分之「同樣條件」通知他共有人,否則,即難認已合法通知行使優先承購權(最高法院109年度台上字第507號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】同居是一件大事
司法院就媒體報導有關擬訂「商業事件律師酬金支給標準草案初稿」為律師費上限等之澄清新聞稿
證言之證據力(最高法院 108 年台上字第 1259 號民事判決)
民法第74條第1 項所定之撤銷權,須以訴之形式向法院請求為撤銷其行為之形成判決,始能發生撤銷之效果(最高法院 109 年台上字第 894 號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】母愛是永遠在他身旁
「挺港」應靠「法治」而非「口惠」
司法院大法官釋字第792號解釋摘要-販賣毒品既遂案
對於一人負擔數宗債務而其給付之種類相同者,如清償人所提出之給付,不足清償全部債額時,不為指定其應抵充之債務者,其債務已屆清償期者,儘先抵充。如獲益及清償期均相等者,各按比例,抵充其一部(最高法院109 年台上字第 1190 號民事判決)
【林蕙瑛專欄】慈悲為懷充滿親情
【林蕙瑛專欄】感情的長期霸凌
罷了韓,就不再「又老又窮」了?
總統令修正「槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例」部分條文
不容異見,民主必死
【林蕙瑛專欄】隱藏生育危機
對岸刑事犯嫌起訴 提起訴意見書

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 作者專欄(二) > 劉育偉


Ardente v. Horan  / 劉育偉
Ardente v. Horan117 R.I.254, 366 A.2d 162 Facts: In August 1975, the property of defendant was offered for sale, the plaintiff accepted it, but added some items that never mentioned before the negotiation between the parties. The ......(詳全文) 2009-10-05 01:00:00
Akers v. J.B. Sedberry, Inc.  / 劉育偉
Akers v. J.B. Sedberry, Inc.39 Tenn.App.633, 286S.W.2d 617, cert. denied by Tenn.S.ct Facts: Plaintiffs have the employment contract with the defendant. On September 29,1950,due to the financial problem, plaintiffs offered to res ......(詳全文) 2009-10-04 01:00:00
Adams v. Lindsell  / 劉育偉
Adams v. Lindsell1 Barn. & Ald. 681. Facts: The defendant, who was a dealer in wool, wrote the letter to offer the plaintiff, who was a woolen manufacturer. And the defendant appointed the answer to reply by post. However, du ......(詳全文) 2009-10-03 01:00:00
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell(actual malice+emotional distress)  / 劉 育偉
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell(actual malice+emotional distress)485 U.S. 46; 108 S. Ct. 876; 99 L. Ed. 2d 41(1988) Facts: P-public official,被Def發表文章,提到P與其母發生亂倫行為。 Issue:Whether actual malice was suitable fo ......(詳全文) 2009-10-01 01:00:00
Flake v. Greensboro News Co.(刑315之1、之2,民195)  / 劉 育偉
Flake v. Greensboro News Co.(刑315之1、之2,民195)195 S.E.55.(1938)(about unauthorized use of one’s photo.)Facts: P控告Def報社涉嫌未經本人同意,將原告個人照片作為商業廣告,公開刊登於報紙上,造成侵害他人隱私。Holding: ......(詳全文) 2009-09-30 01:00:00
Dun&Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss(純私人間的毀謗)  / 劉 育偉
Dun&Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss(純私人間的毀謗)472 U.S.749(1985)Facts: 被告徵信公司誤報原告公司破產,原告認為被告行為已造成商譽上之破壞,而提起文字上毀謗(libel)。Issue:Whether the rule of Gertz applies when the false and ......(詳全文) 2009-09-29 01:00:00
ST. Amant v. Thompson  / 劉 育偉
ST. Amant v. Thompson390 U.S. 727(1968)Facts: Thompson is a public official claim for defamation to St. Amant.Issue: 對actual malice之判斷標準為何?Holding: Judgment for Def. Rational:Deliberate falsification(明知故意不實=wi ......(詳全文) 2009-09-28 01:00:00
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine(對actual malice的具體判斷)  / 劉 育偉
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine(對actual malice的具體判斷)501 U.S. 496,111(1991)Facts: In this libel case, a public figure claims an author who, with knowledge of inaccuracy, used quotation marks to defame him.Issue: 新聞媒體所 ......(詳全文) 2009-09-27 01:00:00
Belli v. Orlando Daily Newspapers, Inc.  / 劉 育偉
Belli v. Orlando Daily Newspapers, Inc.(配合民195、刑310、釋509-探討毀謗性) 389 F.2d 579,cert.denied 393U.S.825, 89 S.Ct. 88,21 L.Ed.2d 96(1968)Facts: This action for damages for libel(文字毀謗-加重毀謗之態樣)and sland ......(詳全文) 2009-09-26 01:00:00
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb  / 劉 育偉
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb494 P.2d 700(1972)Facts: 被告牧場牛隻的排泄物與原告的都市開發計畫相衝突,致使造市計畫的居民權益受損。Holding: Judgment for P. (但原告必須補償被告因遷移或停業之損失)Rational:In the so-calle ......(詳全文) 2009-09-25 01:00:00
Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.(about public figure)  / 劉 育偉
Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.(about public figure)37 F. 3d 1541(1994)Facts: ABC電視公司(Def)依社會事件改編成一部寫實劇,劇中之祖父母(P)被描述成一名加害者,故原告控告被告所言不實而毀謗。Issue:Whether the plaintiff i ......(詳全文) 2009-09-24 01:00:00
Medico v. Time, Inc.(about fair comment)  / 劉 育偉
Medico v. Time, Inc.(about fair comment)634 F.2d 134, certiorari denied,454 U.S.836(1981)Facts: Def published a summary of FBI documents to identify the plaintiff as a member of an organized crime “family”.Holding ......(詳全文) 2009-09-23 01:00:00
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.(about false light)  / 劉 育偉
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.(about false light)419 U.S. 245(1974)Facts:原告災難家屬控告因報導災難而得獎之記者及報社以偏概全及不實錯誤,且未經允許而侵犯其隱私權。Holding: Judgment for P. Rational:The case went to th ......(詳全文) 2009-09-22 01:00:00
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn(about disclosure private affairs)  / 劉 育偉
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn(about disclosure private affairs)420 U.S.469.(1975)(關於「公開」部分)Facts:原告(被害人之父)主張電視台(Def)報導其遭強暴女兒之姓名而侵害P之隱私,而Def主張其有言論自由。Issue: Whether the vic ......(詳全文) 2009-09-21 01:00:00
Pearson v. Dodd(about “intrusion”侵入隱私權問題)  / 劉 育偉
Pearson v. Dodd(about “intrusion”侵入隱私權問題)410 F.2d 701,cert, denied 395U.S.947, 89S.Ct.2021, 23L.Ed.2d 465(1969)Facts:Two former employees of the P entered the plaintiff’s office without authority to D ......(詳全文) 2009-09-20 01:00:00

1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3722
律 師 的 叮 嚀

買法拍屋,遇到「海蟑螂」,拍定人得依民法第767條前段之規定,訴請返還被「海蟑螂」無權占有或侵奪之法拍屋,並得依法追究其相關刑責。

劉孟錦律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
文章資料內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為主張及訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
法令具時效性,文章內容及所引用資料,請自行查核法令動態及現行有效之實務見解
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意